摘要

Background:As pain is the most prominent clinical symptom for cancer patients and closely related to other symptoms,it is necessary to have a comprehensive assessment on promising intervention to improve pain management.Methods:A retrospective study of 489 inpatient cancer patients(1081 visits)was conducted by query-ing the electronic medical record database to test the reliability and validity of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System.Data from a pilot prospective randomized controlled study on acupuncture for can-cer pain was analyzed to validate the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System(ESAS)as the primary outcome in the integrative oncology research.Results:In the retrospective analysis,scores of the numerical rating scale(NRS)and the ESAS total score were significantly correlated(r=0.15,P=0.02),and the correlation coefficient between NRS and pain sub-scale in ESAS was 0.47(P<0.001).The pilot study showed the proportions of participants experi-encing more than a 2-point reduction in NRS at the end of the treatment were 80%(n=12/15)in the acupuncture group and 50%(n=7/14)in the control group,without a significant difference between groups(P=0.13).For the total scores of ESAS,more responders were found in the acupuncture group(n=13/15)compared to that in the control group(n=7/14),with no significant difference between groups(P=0.05).Conclusions:ESAS is suitable for the comprehensive assessment in patients with cancer pain and could be an appropriate outcome measurement in acupuncture research for cancer pain.Trial registration:Registered on 09/07/2018 with ChiCTR1800017023()

全文